Category Archives: Indian Legal Clinic

Estate Planning: 2025-2026

Posted on by

Serving Tribal communities while preparing the next generation of legal advocates is at the heart of ASU Law’s Indian Legal Program. During the 2025-2026 academic year, students in the Indian Legal Clinic’s “Estate Planning” course provided free estate planning services to Tribal citizens through clinics serving the Pechanga Band of Indians, The Quechan Indian Tribe, and the Gila River Indian Community. 

Taught by Professor Helen Burtis (’07), law students worked one-on-one with Tribal citizens to develop estate plans that reflected their personal goals and wishes. Through three community-based clinics, student attorneys drafted and executed wills and health care powers of attorneys tailored for each client’s needs while ensuring compliance with Tribal, state and federal laws. 

Before participating in the clinics, students completed a five-week preparatory course focused on statutes and legal frameworks relevant to estate planning in Indian Country. This foundational training equipped them to provide culturally informed legal services and confidently guide each Tribal client through the estate planning process. 

The clinics offered students an opportunity to put their classroom learning into practice while delivering meaningful legal services to Tribal communities. During each two-day clinic, students met individually with clients, listened carefully to their stories and priorities and translated those conversations into legal documents designed to protect their assets and dignity. The hands-on experience strengthened students’ skills in client counseling, legal drafting and problem-solving while deepening their understanding of the unique legal considerations facing Tribal citizens. 

In Oct. 2025, six students traveled to the Temecula Valley, California to work with members of the Pechanga Band of Indians. Third-year law students Chase Duncan, Avery Hampton, Della Helwig, Sarah Mancuso, Cristella Medrano and Cameron Welker assisted 12 clients in preparing estate planning documents, including 12 wills and nine health care powers of attorney.

The work continued in Feb. 2026 when six clinic students traveled to the homelands of the Quechan Indian Tribe. Over two impactful days of service, Gabby Curatola (3L), Sam Fraser (3L), Hannah May (2L), Julia King (2L), Monique McClung (3L) and Eric Vince (3L) assisted clients in creating comprehensive estate plans, preparing 14 wills and eight health care powers of attorney. The clinic also reinforced the Clinic’s longstanding relationship with the Quechan Indian Tribe.

In April, seven student attorneys served closer to home at the Gila River Indian Community. Connor Bacci (2L),  Shuuluk Leo-Retz (2L), Hunter Mallinger (3L), Justice Oglesby (3L), Sierra Poore (2L) Kelly Rockhold (2L) and Monique Tsosie (3L) assisted 14 Tribal members to prepare 14 wills and seven health care powers of attorney.

Across the three clinics, students helped 40 Tribal citizens create estate plans that protect their wishes and provide peace of mind for their families. At the same time, they gained invaluable experience working directly with clients and navigating the legal frameworks that govern estate planning to the Tribal communities they serve.

The Indian Legal Program remains grateful to the Tribal Nations that continue to partner with ASU Law and welcome students into their communities. These relationships are foundational to the program’s mission of preparing future lawyers to serve Tribal communities with knowledge, humility and respect, while expanding access to critical legal services.

Building practice through Tribal Courts

Posted on by

To kick off the spring semester, Professor Patty Ferguson-Bohnee and Indian Legal Clinic students Jerimy Billy, Angel Nosie, Justice Oglesby, Crispin South and Monique Tsosie traveled to the Ak-Chin Indian Community Tribal Court in Maricopa, Arizona, and the Gila River Indian Community Court in Sacaton on Jan. 30. The visit marked the beginning of the students’ hands-on legal training, where they will work directly with real clients through the clinic.

At the Ak-Chin Indian Community Court, students met with Prosecutor Raymond Vaca (’06) and pretrial officer Xavier Rojas, who provided an overview of court proceedings and shared insights from their legal careers.

Students also met with Chairman Gabriel Lopez of the Ak-Chin Indian Community and Ammon Orr (’16) a prosecutor at Gila River. Chairman Lopez spoke about the Tribe’s history, leadership’s role in advancing community interests, the Tribe’s successes and the importance of preparing the next generation to protect its sovereignty and legacy. Orr shared his journey in the legal profession and his work as a prosecutor serving tribes.

At the Gila River Indian Community Court, student attorneys took an important step in their legal careers as they were sworn in by Chief Judge Anthony Hill (’06). Judge Charles Aragon led a tour of the court, introducing students to judges and staff and offering a behind-the-scenes look at the court’s operations.

“I’m excited for the clinic and the opportunity to gain practical experience,” said third-year law student Nosie. “Taking the oath and being sworn in is especially meaningful — it’s something I’ve never been exposed to before. Experiencing it firsthand and beginning to practice like a lawyer makes me excited for the future.”

The Indian Legal Program extends its appreciation to the Ak-Chin Indian Community and the Gila River Indian Community for their continued support and partnership in educating the next generation of Tribal advocates.

Election procedures manual Tribal leader listening session 

Posted on by

On Aug. 28, Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, Indian Legal Clinic director and associate dean for Inclusive Excellence, and Maya Araujo, Native Vote Management Intern, attended a Tribal Leader Listening Session on the Arizona Election Procedures Manual (EPM). Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes in partnership with the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona held the session to gather feedback specifically from Tribal leaders on the draft of the 2025 EPM. Arizona law requires the Secretary of State to draft an EPM that brings “the maximum degree of correctness, impartiality, uniformity and efficiency” to elections. The EPM must be updated on odd-numbered years and submitted to the Attorney General and Governor for their approval. 

At the Tribal Leader Listening Session, Fontes and Lisa Marra, State Election director from the Office of the Arizona Secretary of State, provided an overview of the EPM. Ferguson-Bohnee presented on the Tribal provisions and relevant topics from the EPM that impact Tribal voting rights. The ILC engages in the EPM comment process closely as, once approved, the EPM has the force of law and is a binding document that ensures the election process is consistent, efficient and legally sound for every voter.

Review the full 2025 Elections Procedures Manual.

Democracy Reform Summit

Posted on by

On Oct. 3, the Indian Legal Clinic cohosted the “Democracy Reform Summit: Removing Barriers to Native Political Participation” in partnership with the Native American Rights Fund and the Brennan Center for Justice. The summit brought together over 150 people working together to uncover both the challenges to equitable political engagement for tribal voters and the opportunities to cultivate it. Participants included experts in civic engagement, legal advocates and leading researchers to discuss strategies for expanding Native American political representation. Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, Indian Legal Clinic director and associate dean for Inclusive Excellence, hosted a roundtable discussion on the State of Play of Native Voting Rights at the Federal Level, which explored threats to the Voting Rights Act and prospects for strengthening it, the need to pass the Native American Voting Rights Act and the efforts to build a grassroots movement in support of federal Native voting rights legislation.

If you missed the event, review the recording

Native Voting Rights Coalition annual convening

Posted on by
2025 Native Voting Rights Coalition annual convening

On Oct. 2, members of the Native Voting Rights Coalition (NAVRC) gathered for their annual convening at the Sheraton Grand at Wild Horse Pass.

NAVRC is a nonpartisan alliance of national and grassroots organizations, scholars and activists advocating for equal access to the political process for Native Americans. The Native American Rights Fund founded the coalition in 2015 to foster collaboration among members and coordinate efforts to overcome barriers Native voters face in registering to vote, casting their ballots and having an equal voice in elections.

While NAVRC members meet virtually each month to discuss voting issues in Indian Country and develop solutions to address unique challenges, the annual convening provides an opportunity for members to meet face-to-face, reflect on ongoing projects and plan for the 2026 election and beyond.

Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee presented on behalf of the NAVRC’s Voter Discrimination Subcommittee at the convening, discussing the upcoming projects and ongoing national litigation. Following the subcommittee presentation, Ferguson-Bohnee, Native Vote Fellow Sadie Red Eagle (’25), Torey Dolan (’19) and Native Vote Management Intern Maya Araujo participated in breakout group discussions regarding concerns and potential solutions for the upcoming 2026 election cycle.

Indian Legal Clinic files amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on voting rights

Posted on by

On Sept. 3, the Indian Legal Clinic filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Navajo Nation in Louisiana v. Phillip Callais, et al., regarding voting rights. Written by Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, Torey Dolan (’19) and attorneys from the Navajo Nation Department of Justice, the brief addresses Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the creation of majority-minority congressional districts consistent with the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, supporting neither party.
 
ILC students Mikaela Bledsoe Downes (3L), Hunter Mallinger (3L), Sam Phillips (3L) and Ronnie Strode III (3L) assisted in research and drafting the brief.
 
Honore Callingham (’18) and Jordan Garcia (’23) are greatly appreciated for their assistance in reviewing and preparing the brief for filing.
 
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday, Oct. 15.

 

ILC 2024-2025 Reflection

Posted on by

During the 2024-2025 academic year, five student attorneys dedicated nearly 1,800 hours to the Indian Legal Clinic (ILC) at ASU Law. Under the leadership of Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, director and Charles M. Brewer professor of trial advocacy at ASU Law, the ILC collectively managed 35 cases spanning Tribal, state and federal law.

Third-year law students Garrett Bryan, Shandiin Herrera, Imani Hicks, Morgan Oakes and Sadie Red Eagle served as student attorneys and represented clients in a wide range of matters. Their work included cases involving voting rights, criminal defense, federal recognition and the restoration of civil rights — such as the right to vote — for disenfranchised individuals.

In addition to casework, ILC students developed practical skills through class simulations designed to build analytical and trial advocacy abilities. These exercises culminated in a full Tribal court civil mock trial, helping prepare students to become effective advocates for their future careers.

As part of ILC’s Arizona Native Vote Election Protection, student attorneys focused on the 2024 election cycle.

In the fall semester, ILC students appeared regularly in Tribal courts. Student attorneys defended clients in Ak-Chin Indian Community Tribal Court. Bryan appeared twice in Traffic Court on behalf of the Gila River Indian Community to prosecute civil traffic violations.

ILC also contributed changes to federal regulations governing the acknowledgment process, which now allows previously denied Tribes a limited opportunity to reapply for federal recognition. The new rule, effective February 14, 2025, follows court decisions that deemed the previous ban on re-petitioning unfair. The ILC submitted comments emphasizing fairness and the importance of recognition for Tribal sovereignty and cultural survival — comments that were cited in the final rule.

ILC submitted background information on the United States to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, Dr. Albert K. Barume, for his reports to international organizations. In March, ILC submitted input on the process and challenges of obtaining federal recognition for Special Rapporteur Barume’s report to be presented at the 60th session of the Human Rights Council, in September 2025, where he intends to examine ways and means of overcoming obstacles and promoting best practices related to the recognition by States of Indigenous Peoples. In April, ILC submitted information about the recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ rights to lands, territories and resources in the United States. Per a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution, Special Rapporteur Barume is dedicating his next annual report to the UN General Assembly to the theme “Identification, Documentation, Demarcation, Registration, and Titling of Indigenous Peoples’ Lands: Practices and Lessons Learned”.

“I am very thankful for the opportunity to work with real clients in a real court,” said Herrera. “The opportunity to practice in a courtroom while in law school was so critical to my education. Through the clinic, I was able to practice litigation skills through in-class simulations and then apply my improved skills in the courtroom. This approach fosters growth and confidence. What is unfamiliar, like addressing a judge, questioning a witness, and filing pleadings, begins to feel routine.”

Additionally, the ILC continued its Estate Planning course taught by Professor Helen Burtis (’07) and hosted four clinics serving Tribal communities across Arizona and California.

In April, second-year law student Hunter Mallinger and Ferguson-Bohnee presented to the ABA Civil Rights and Social Justice section. In the Rapid Response on Native Americans & Birthright Citizenship, they discussed the legal and civil rights implications of Executive Order 14160, which targets birthright citizenship, and its impact on Native Americans. The conversation explored the history and legal foundations of Native American citizenship, dispelled misconceptions, and highlighted current threats from immigration enforcement, offering valuable insights for affected Native Americans, their communities, advocates and legal professionals.

Learn more about the Indian Legal Clinic’s
2024–2025 community impact:

Native Vote 2024-2025 Reflection

Posted on by

During the 2024–2025 academic year, the Indian Legal Clinic (ILC) at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law focused its efforts on the Native Vote Election Protection Project, ensuring Arizona’s Native voters were informed, supported and empowered throughout the state and federal election cycle. This year, the ILC welcomed Maya Araujo as the management intern, tasked with tracking and producing the most accurate data on Native voter participation in Arizona.

The 2024 Arizona Native Vote Election Protection Project team included our Indian Legal Clinic third-year law students Garrett Bryan, Shandiin Herrera (co-lead), Imani Hicks, Morgan Oakes and Sadie Red Eagle (co-lead), all working under the supervision of ILC Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee. They were joined by a dedicated team of advocates running the hotline with Democracy Director Joel Edman, Honore Callingham (’18), Torey Dolan (’19), Jordan Garcia (’23), Blair Tarman-Toner (’20), Alexander Castillo-Nunez from the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (ITCA) and Araujo. 

In collaboration with partner organizations, the team actively defended Native voting rights across the state. The ILC participated in and drafted four election lawsuits on behalf of the Navajo Nation and Gila River Indian Community. These cases sought to compel Arizona counties to comply with election laws and ensure polling locations remained open in the face of disruptions on Election Day.

The Native Vote Election Protection Project successfully recruited and trained 100 volunteers who were deployed to 63 polling places across nine counties and 11 Tribal reservations. On Election Day, volunteers provided real-time support to voters, addressed legal questions and ensured that Arizona election laws were properly followed. The team fielded over 300 hotline calls and documented 227 incidents — ranging from ballot issues, voter registration issues and polling location equipment malfunctions. Volunteers also collected 35 sworn declarations from voters, which became crucial evidence in same-day litigation against Apache County. The resulting court order extended voting by two hours at affected locations — ensuring that every eligible voter had the opportunity to cast their ballot.

Following the election, the ILC presented its findings and recommendations to multiple stakeholders. The team briefed the Navajo Nation Department of Justice on voter turnout, Election Day litigation, Election Day litigation, polling issues on the Nation and statewide trends. 

In January, student co-leads Red Eagle and Herrera joined Katherine Belzowski of the Navajo Nation Department of Justice for a panel titled “Democracy Ambassadors and the Native Vote” at the American Bar Association’s Democracy Task Force for American Democracy Listening Session in Arizona. Moderated by Ferguson-Bohnee, the panel shared firsthand insights from Chinle polling site on Election Day and highlighted failures in Apache County.

In February, ILC was invited to present “Challenges for Native Voters and Voter Turnout” to the Indigenous Peoples Caucus at the Arizona state legislature. Araujo and Herrera joined Ferguson-Bohnee to outline barriers to voting, discuss the Project’s mission, review Native voter data from 2016-2024 and offer recommendations to improve accessibility. Ferguson-Bohnee also presented to the League of Women Voters of Arizona on how identification requirements, voting by mail and polling location access impact tribal communities.

In April, the Law Journal for Social Justice at ASU hosted its Spring Symposium, “Voting Rights and Voter Disenfranchisement in Arizona,” at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. The symposium brought together legal advocates, community organizers and election officials to examine barriers to voting access in Arizona and discuss strategies to reform procedures for future election cycles. Among the featured speakers were Araujo, Ferguson-Bohnee, Herrera and Red Eagle. 

Also in April, ILP student Hunter Mallinger (3L) joined Ferguson-Bohnee in a presentation to the ABA Civil Rights and Social Justice section. During the Rapid Response on Native Americans & Birthright Citizenship, they discussed Executive Order 14160 and its impact on Native Americans. The session explored the legal history of Native American citizenship, dispelled misconceptions, and addressed emerging threats from immigration policy and enforcement. 

In May, ILC’s work was again highlighted during the ITCA Native Vote Convening, where Tribal leaders, election officials, legal scholars and voting-rights advocates reflected on the 2024 election cycle. Herrera and Red Eagle shared the Project’s findings, discussed common issues observed at the polls and offered strategies for improving voter access in Arizona’s Tribal communities.

Through strategic litigation, grassroots organizing and civic education, the Indian Legal Clinic’s Native Vote Election Protection Project continues to play a vital role in protecting the rights of Native voters and promoting a more inclusive and equitable democracy in Arizona.

ASU Indian Legal Clinic Comments on New Federal Acknowledgement Re-Petitioning Regulations

Posted on by

The Indian Legal Clinic (ILC) has actively monitored the regulations governing the Federal acknowledgment process since 2009. Effective Feb. 14, 2025, the United States Department of the Interior (“Interior”) will implement revisions to these regulations – governing the process through which the Secretary acknowledges an Indian Tribe – introducing a conditional, time-limited opportunity for denied petitioners to re-petition for Federal acknowledgment. Previously, the 1994 and 2015 regulations governing the Federal acknowledgment process, under 25 CFR part 83, explicitly prohibited re-petitioning. However, Interior reconsidered the ban following two Federal district court rulings in June 2022, which deemed Interior’s justification for the ban arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act and remanded to Interior for further consideration.

On Sept. 5, 2024, the ILC attended a listening session led by Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs Bryan Newland. The session brought together attendees, primarily Tribes seeking federal recognition, who largely supported the proposed rule to establish a limited exception to the ban through a re-petition authorization process. The Interior’s sessions and written comment period (which has since closed as of Sept. 13) garnered comments from stakeholders, including federally recognized Tribes, State-recognized Tribes, non-federally recognized groups, national associations, inter-Tribal organizations, State and local government representatives, congressional delegations and coalitions and academic institutions – among them, the Indian Legal Clinic at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at ASU.

ILC Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, student attorney Morgan Oakes (3L) and Law Fellow Jordan Garcia (’23) drafted a substantive comment about the changes to the proposed rule. The ILC comment letter emphasized fairness as a key justification for the amendment. The final published rule directly referenced the ILC’s comment, highlighting a “lack of recognition can negatively impact a Tribe’s ability to exercise its self-determination in areas such as defending sovereignty, protecting culture, accessing resources, and ensuring the survival of tribal ways of life.”To review the new regulations, visit 25 CFR Part 83.

Standing strong: The fight for fair Native voting rights

Posted on by

On Election Day, Indian Legal Clinic Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee and Navajo Nation Attorney General Ethel Branch filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Navajo Nation against Apache County officials for violating Tribal members’ fundamental right to vote, and other crucial rights guaranteed by federal and state law. Torey Dolan (’19) helped run the Arizona Native Vote hotline and submitted her declaration to support the lawsuit.

Apache County officials failed to comply with essential voting requirements, including opening polling locations on time, providing correctly printed ballots, maintaining adequate ballot supplies and long lines with wait times up to 2-3 hours – denying many Navajo voters the opportunity to vote. A voter reported to the Arizona Native Vote Hotline that elders left because standing in the 40-degree weather for extended periods was too much hardship.

Third-year law students Shandiin Herrera and Sadie Red Eagle, in the field at voting locations in Apache County, were quoted in Cronkite News article “Voters in Navajo Nation face polling issues on Election Day; Apache County extends voting hours.” Candace French (’17), an attorney voting in Window Rock, was nearly turned away when she presented her Tribal ID at an Apache County polling site. Dolan was also interviewed by azcentral, detailing the issues reported to the Arizona Native Vote hotline.

“It’s a huge issue to be precinct-based, especially in rural parts of the county, and especially on tribal lands, because as we saw today, there’s just so much confusion. And so people don’t have gas money, they don’t have the time, they have to go back to work. And so if it was in the vote-center system, they could just go to any polling location and cast a standard ballot.”
Shandiin Herrera (Navajo Nation) Third-year law student and co-lead

Many Navajo voters attempted to vote but were unable to due to Apache County’s many systemic failings. The Navajo Nation successfully secured a court order to extend voting hours at nine polling sites where Arizona Native Vote Election Protection Project volunteers observed these issues, as well as the locations where Navajo voters reported significant issues to the Arizona Native Vote Hotline. Herrera and Red Eagle defended voters’ rights to the extended voting hours against uninformed poll workers and police presence.

In an ASU News article, Herrera highlighted the extensive current voting barriers Native Americans face in rural communities.

We extend our deepest gratitude to all volunteers, advocates, allies and partners who served as Native Vote Protectors, working tirelessly to amplify Native voting power! This year, over 100 dedicated volunteers served as Native Vote Protectors, assisting voters across multiple polling locations in 12 Tribal communities: the Ak-Chin Indian Community, the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, the Fort Mohave Tribe, the Gila River Indian Community, the Hopi Tribe, the Navajo Nation, the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, the San Carlos Apache Tribe, the Tohono O’odham Nation, the Yavapai-Apache Nation, and the White Mountain Apache Tribe. Thanks to your efforts, we were able to support voters both through the hotline and on the ground, addressing issues and ensuring that Native voters could exercise their fundamental right to cast their ballots.

This year’s Arizona Native Vote Election Protection Project mighty team includes our Indian Legal Clinic third-year law students Garrett Bryan, Shandiin Herrera (co-lead), Imani Hicks, Morgan Oakes and Sadie Red Eagle (co-lead), under the supervision of Director Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, who ran the hotline with Democracy Director Joel Edman, Maya Araujo, Honore Callingham (’18), Torey Dolan (’19), Jordan Garcia (’23), Blair Tarman-Toner (’20) and Alexander Castillo-Nunez from the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.