Chronicle of Higher Education article featuring ILP

American Indian Law: a Surge of Interest on Campuses

By KATHERINE MANGAN
Tempe, Az.

Growing up on a Navajo reservation near Gallup, N.M., Jordan Hale never dreamed he would one day be standing in front of a courtroom recommending whether a defendant should be released on bond, or working with a prosecutor to draft a criminal complaint.

Becoming a lawyer was the farthest thing from the mind of the high-school runner whose home, at the end of a dirt road, had no running water or telephone.

Now he is one of 37 students, representing 29 Indian tribes, who are specializing in Indian law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. All but one of the students are American Indian, and they bring with them diverse traditions of such tribes as the Chippewa, Choctaw, Crow, Jicarilla Apache, and Mohawk.

At law schools nationwide, interest in Indian law is growing as the economic clout and political influence of the nation’s 562 federally recognized tribes have expanded.

Arizona State’s Indian Legal Program allows students who are pursuing their J.D.’s to simultaneously earn certificates in Indian law. They study the differences between the legal systems of tribes and that of the U.S. government, and many go on to represent the interests of tribes, Indian clients, or the federal government.

Tribes have sovereignty rights that are spelled out in treaties with the United States, so their laws don’t always align with the government’s. That is why, for instance, Indian tribes can open casinos that would not be permitted on nontribal land.

“More and more law schools are recognizing the importance of including Indian law in the curriculum because their graduates are encountering questions that require some knowledge of Indian law and sovereignty,” says Wenona T. Singel, an assistant professor of law at Michigan State University. Like many Indian law professors, Ms. Singel brings practical experience to the classroom. In addition to helping lead her law school’s Indian-law program, she serves as chief justice of her tribe, the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.

She says about 20 law schools nationwide report having Indian-law programs, while other experts say the number of full-fledged programs is about 12. Among the other law schools active in Indian law are those at Harvard University, Lewis and Clark College, and the Universities of Colorado, New Mexico, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Learning the basics of tribal law is more than an academic exercise for many law students.
A few states, including New Mexico, South Dakota, and Washington, have Indian-law topics on their bar exam that students must pass to practice law. Others, including Arizona, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, and Oklahoma, are considering adding such a requirement. Students get hands-on training in legal clinics and clerkships like the one Mr. Hale pursued over the summer at the Gila River Indian Community, 17 miles south of Phoenix.

Nationally, Indian tribes take in billions of dollars in casino revenues, which have allowed some to build state-of-the art courthouses like Gila River’s.

Mr. Hale, who is entering his third year of law school at Arizona State, worked in Gila River’s criminal-law division under the supervision of April E. Olson, a 2006 graduate of the university’s Indian legal program. Ms. Olson, who is of Mexican Yaqui ancestry, is a prosecutor at Gila River.
The tribe’s modern, high-tech courthouse stands out amid a flat landscape of desert scrub. A few blocks away, the prosecution office where Mr. Hale and Ms. Olson prepare their cases is a shotgun mobile unit located behind fences topped with coils of barbed wire.

The casinos that have helped pay for courthouse upgrades have also spurred economic development, with shopping malls, restaurants, and service industries springing up on or near many reservations. As a result, “More big law firms are looking for people who are knowledgeable about Indian law,” said Kathlene M. Rosier, director of Arizona State’s program.
Such expertise is particularly valued in a state where more than a quarter of the land is owned by one of 22 Indian tribes.

Many of the legal questions that arise involve jurisdictional disputes between the tribal and federal or state governments. For instance, what happens when an outsider commits a crime on tribal land, or a company tries to repossess a car parked on a reservation? Legal standards may also differ: Environmental regulations may be stricter on tribal lands, and child-welfare laws more relaxed to accommodate traditions of caring for children in extended families. Indian reservations, many of which are located on arid lands, have battled with the federal government over water access, with dueling parties claiming the rights to the same water sources.

Such issues are tackled in classes at the University of New Mexico’s Indian Law Program, one of the oldest and largest in the country. The program includes required courses, like those in Indian law and federal jurisdiction, and electives like Indian gaming, Indian water law, and state-tribal relations.

Because of the shortage of American Indian lawyers, graduates specializing in the field often land high-level positions. Shortly after completing Arizona State’s program, Claudette C. White became, at age 35, the youngest chief judge ever on the Fort Yuma-Quechan Reservation, where she grew up, near the intersection of Arizona, California, and Mexico.

Even after she graduated and became the tribe’s top legal authority, in 2006, she found herself turning to her professors for advice. One of them, Kevin Gover, is a former assistant secretary for Indian affairs at the U.S. Department of the Interior. (He has since become director of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of the American Indian).

“Sometimes I had to adjourn court to affirm that I was heading in the right direction,” Ms. White said. Mr. Gover wouldn’t just tell her the answers. Instead he would remind her about class discussions and readings and help her work through the solution.

Although she was fresh out of law school, Ms. White was no stranger to tribal governance.
She majored in criminal justice at Northern Arizona University before returning to the reservation. She plunged into tribal politics, becoming a court advocate and working as acting general manager of the tribe’s casino.

When she was named chief judge, shortly after graduating from law school, “Some people had doubts about whether I was ready because I was so young,” she said. “But I had had a lot of personal experiences directly relevant to the cases I’m working on.” A single mother who was raising her own child in addition to the two foster children she had taken on when her own mother died, Ms. White was sensitive to child-welfare issues that came before her in court. Her struggles with her own parents’ divorce and her father’s alcohol and drug addictions gave her insight into other cases that were all too common in her courtroom.

Despite aggressive recruiting by law schools, the number of American Indian lawyers remains tiny. Nationally, the number of American Indian and Alaskan Natives enrolled in J.D. programs has grown 19 percent over the last five years, to 1,216, according to the American Bar Association. Still, that is less than 1 percent of the 141,719 students who were enrolled in J.D. programs in the 2007-8 academic year.

The 1,216 enrollment estimate may be too high, according to Heather Dawn Thompson, president of the National Native American Bar Association and a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux. Most law schools report enrollments based on the number of students who simply checked a “Native American” box. “A lot of students figure, ‘I was born in America – I’m a native’ and they figure that checking it will improve their chances of getting in, she says.
Because of the dearth of American Indian lawyers, cases involving Indians are usually handled by lawyers who are unfamiliar with tribal laws.

Nathan St. Goddard, a student at the University of Montana School of Law who worked with Mr. Hale over the summer at the Gila River reservation, believes it is important to have Indian lawyers representing the needs of Indian people. While other lawyers may come with the best intentions, they won’t have the same cultural sensitivity, he says.

“People come with some idealized notion of wanting to help the Indians and save the buffalos, but they don’t know what they’re doing,” says Mr. St. Goddard, a member of the Blackfeet tribe.
“What I see happening all the time is a non-Indian who has this romantic view of the ‘noble savage’ who thinks that we sit in our teepees and bang on our drums and pray to Mother Earth and cry every time we see a piece of trash on the ground.” What he sees when he returns home is a poor, dirty reservation of 1.5 million acres patrolled by a little more than a dozen tribal police officers. The tribal court, as well as the jail, is swamped. With his legal training and understanding of tribal life, he hopes to help change that, and would like to see other Indian students follow in his footsteps.

“Indians,” he says, “need to start saving themselves.”

Navajo Nation conduct hearings at College of Law

The Navajo Nation Supreme Court heard arguments on Thursday, Sept. 18, in a special hearing at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. The case, Ford Motor Co. v. Kayenta District Court, centered on whether tribal courts should have jurisdiction in the wrongful death case in which a Navajo Nation police officer was killed in a car accident while on duty.

Dean Paul Schiff Berman thanked the Justices for holding the hearing at the College of Law and told the students they were privileged to be able to watch a court in action and ask questions afterward.

The Navajo Nation Supreme Court is the first of several courts that will hold hearings at the College of Law this year. Others include the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court.

The Navajo Nation Supreme Court is of particular interest, Berman said, because it is the court of a sovereign nation, and there often are jurisdictional questions between tribal courts and state and federal courts. “There are 22 tribes that have lands within the state of Arizona,” Berman said. “Virtually all have their own codes and their own courts.”

Herb Yazzie, Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation Supreme Court, and a 1975 graduate of the College of Law, told students that the modern Navajo courts have evolved since the arrival of the Europeans, and continue to evolve today. “First there was the military occupation, then the treaties, then the Bureau of Indian Affairs courts, and it has evolved into the Navajo court system,” Yazzie said. He explained that each of the Navajo Nation’s 11 districts has both district and family courts, and each district has at least one trial judge, some have two. In addition, the Nation continues to use a traditional way of resolving disputes, called peacemaking, in which all parties agree to work out a solution. The peacemaking system was in place before Europeans arrived. Yazzie said the question of whether tribal courts have jurisdiction is nearly constant. “These questions are happening on a day-to-day basis, in reality, in our relationship with the U.S. government,” Yazzie said.

Asked about the peacemaking system, Yazzie explained that Navajo law mandates the use of traditional law and values in the court system, and that the peacemaking system is practiced daily in cases where all the parties agree to participate. Lawyers who practice on the reservation are expected to know the law, he said. “As they say, ‘When in Rome, do as the Romans do,’ ” Yazzie said, drawing a laugh from the audience.

One student asked which court would preside over a conflict between two tribes, and Yazzie said the dispute would have to be resolved between the two sovereign entities. “The bottom line in the use of courts is that you are going to someone else and asking them to make a decision for you,” Yazzie said. “Human beings ought to resolve things between themselves. The best resolution is one you make, not someone else.” Yazzie was joined by Associate Justices Eleanor Shirley and Louise G. Grant to hear the Ford Motor case.
The Navajo Supreme Court helda hearing at the Sandra Day O’Connor Collegeof Law on Thursday, Sept. 18. The case involved a wrongful death claim brought by the Todecheene family. Their daughter, Esther, an officer with the Navajo Department of Public Safety, died when her Ford Expedition patrol vehicle rolled on a dirt road in the Navajo Nation. The vehicle was one of several purchased by the tribe for the department through a dealership in Gallup, N.M. Ford maintains that Todecheene was not wearing her seat belt; her parents say the vehicle was defective, and the seat belt did not work properly.

However, the question at issue at Thursday’s hearing was not the wrongful death claim, but whether the Navajo courts have jurisdiction to hear the case. Ford argues that the Navajo courts lack jurisdiction. The Kayenta District Court on the Navajo Nation ruled that it did have jurisdiction. Ford took the case to federal district court, which ruled the tribal court did not have jurisdiction. The Navajo Nation appealed and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court agreed with the federal district court, then vacated its own ruling and asked Ford to take the case to the Navajo Nation Supreme Court.

The 9th Circuit wanted the Navajo Nation Supreme Court to decide whether an exception applied that would give the Navajo Nation jurisdiction if the actions of a non-Indian “threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the tribe.” The Navajo Supreme Court also asked the parties to discuss whether the Treaty of 1868 with the United States allows the Navajo Nation to hear the case, and the effect of a recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co. Richard Derevan, attorney for Ford, argued that the only issue before the court should be the exception, and that it shouldn’t apply because an automobile accident didn’t constitute a threat to the tribe. The other issues were not argued in the earlier courts and, therefore, should not be allowed at this point in the proceedings, Derevan said.

Yazzie questioned Derevan over his assertion that the death did not affect the political integrity of the Navajo Nation. “If the death of one police officer is not sufficient, then how many must die before it is?” Yazzie asked. Derevan said the case was not a case that threatened the governance of the tribe, and one that could be handled by state or federal courts. Yazzie also asked about how far the family would have to travel to file a claim if the tribal courts were not open to them. Derevan said that the tribe should ask the state and federal courts to hold proceedings closer and more convenient for tribal members. Edward Fitzhugh, attorney for the Todecheene family, said the case had followed “a long, tortured path” to the Navajo Nation Supreme Court. He argued that a police officer is an obvious government operator and that the case does fit the exception. He also argued that Ford actively promoted the sale of vehicles on the reservation, and that it had used the tribal courts for its own purpose, for example, to assist in repossession of cars, and therefore should be subject to its jurisdiction in this case. The court took the matter under advisement and will post its decision on NavajoCourts.org when it is reached.

Below is a link that will take you the audio of the oral argument.
https://deimos.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/BrowsePrivately/asu.edu.1417530170

Language Conference in Rapid City, South Dakota

George Patton (’05) is one of the conference organizers for this historic event. View the website for more details about the conference and how to get involved.
Uniting the Seven Council Fires to Save the Language
Lakota Dakota Nakota Language Summit
November 11, 12, 13, 2008
Ramkota Hotel & Covention Center
Rapid City, SD

Oceti Sakowin – The Seven Council Fires
The Seven Council Fires are the seven bands that make up the Lakota Dakota Nakota Oyate, known today as The Great Sioux Nation.
Mdewakantunwan
Wahpe Kute
Wahpetunwan
Sinsintunwan
Ihanktunwan
Ihanktunwanna – Includes Stoney/Assiniboine
Tintatuwan

Today members of these bands are located on reservations and reserves in South Dakota, North Dakota, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan.
Tatanka Iyotaka – Sitting Bull

The last major gathering of the Oceti Sakowin was in 1876. It was Sitting Bull that brought the people together to live the traditional way of life that had been given them by their ancestors. During this gathering of the people, George A. Custer and the 7th Cavalry attacked their peaceful camp and were quickly wiped out by men and women as they defended their homes, their children, their elders, and their way of life.

Today, 130 years later we’re asking Tatanka Iyotaka to once again unite the Seven Council Fires to celebrate and defend our way of life by revitalizing our language.

http://www.tuswecatiospaye.org/L_D_N_Language_Summit.html
Click Here to register online now (participant, vendor, sponsor)
Click Here for printable registration forms

To make reservations at the Ramkota Hotel call (605) 343-8550. To get the discount rate of $70.00 per night be sure to let them know you will be staying for the Lakota Dakota Nakota Language Summit

Student Mixer with NABA-AZ

Dear NABA-AZ Members:

Please join us on Thursday September 25th at 5:30 p.m. at Macayo’s in Tempe for our second NABA-AZ Student Mixer! The details are on the attached flyer. At the mixer, we will be announcing the three NABA-AZ Book Scholarship winners. Please RSVP to Jenny Braybrooke at jbraybro@fclaw.com or 602-916-5247 by September 18th

Hope to see you there!

Thanks!

Kerry Patterson
NABA-AZ President

Article by Katosha Nakai (’03)


Katosha Belvin Nakai (’03) of Lewis and Roca LLP has an article featured in Arizona’s Environmental and Natural Resources Law Section Update August 2008. “Penny-Wise or Pound Foolish: Business Investment in the Implementation of a Tribal Superfund law” can be found on page 4 of the update.

Humetewa on Native American Calling

U.S. Attorney Diane Humetewa:
scheduled guest for Native America Calling
Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2008
The show will be broadcast on KUYI, HOPI radio at 10 am Arizona time and on KGHR – Tuba City at 11am Daylight Savings time . You can also listen on-line at www.nv1.org at the same times.

Native in the Spotlight Diane Humetewa:
U.S. Attorneys are federal prosecutors who represent the U.S. government in the federal courts. Each U.S. Attorney is the chief federal law enforcement officer within his or her particular jurisdiction. Last December Diane Humetewa (Hopi) was sworn in as U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona, marking the first time an American Indian woman has been appointed as a U.S. Attorney. Her office prosecutes violent crimes such as sexual assault and homicide, as well as drug trafficking, fraud, and bank robbery. The Arizona district includes 21 Indian reservations. What’s it like being a real life, modern day crime fighter?

Christopher Clark Deschene (’05) – District 2 Winner

Chabin retains House seat for Flag

J. FERGUSON Sun Staff Reporter Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Flagstaff will keep one local representative in the gerrymandered Legislative District 2, and it will be the incumbent, state Rep. Tom Chabin, D-Flagstaff. Chabin finished second in a three-person primary race to select two House members from LD2, which includes the city of the Flagstaff and the much larger Navajo Nation. The leading vote-getter was Christopher Clark Deschene, a Window Rock attorney. Finishing third and out of the running was Flagstaff contractor Mark Haughwout. Because there are no Republicans on the November ballot, Chabin and Deschene are virtually assured of election.

In the Senate Republican primary in Legislative District 1, another gerrymandered district that includes the unincorporated communities around Flagstaff but is centered in Yavapai County, veteran lawmaker Tom O’Halleran lost his seat to Prescott rancher Steve Pierce. Because there are no Democrats on the November ballot, Pierce has the seat virtually locked up.

BUDGET THE TOP CONCERN Speaking from his home on the Rez with his wife an infant son watching the polls over the Internet, Deschene said he was thrilled with the results.”We are very excited here, there is a lot of energy here,” Deschene said, He said concerns on how to balance the budget on during an economic downturn without cutting vital services would be his primary concern when taking office in January. “The budget is my number one concern,” he said. “Once we get a handle on that we can focus on a number of issues important to northern Arizona. “Deschene said he hoped to focus on water and environmental issues during his first year in office.

Chabin said he was appreciative that the voters would send him back to the Legislature.”I’m very grateful. I’ve enjoyed working in the Legislature for about a year and serving as a member of the House,” Chabin said. “Winning the election in my own right makes me very, very grateful.”Top priorities next session: Education, health care and funding mental health services. He said funding would be the biggest hurdle.”For the state of Arizona to step up to the challenges of adequately funding education,” Chabin said.Chabin proposes taking funding question to the voters.He said with the loss of O’Halleran he will need to work harder in finding allies in the Republican Party for legislation.”We’re going to have to work harder to seek moderation and reaching across the isle. This is certainly true if Sen. O’Halleran does not win his election” he said.

LABELED AN OUTSIDER Haughwout was labeled an outsider in the Democratic Party, dropped from campaign literature and not invited to some party functions after launching a legal challenge against both Deschene and state Rep. Albert Tom. At issue were the addresses used on nominating petition signatures for the candidates, and the challenge eventually led to Tom dropping out of the race when he conceded he did not have enough valid signatures. Deschene survived the legal challenge. Haughwout’s challenge to signatures mostly gathered on the Rez seemingly backfired as Haughwout’s campaign got less than 15 percent of the votes on the Rez.

NO NEW LAWS In Senate District 1, O’Halleran became a target of some Republicans who question his loyalty to the party and asked Pierce to run against the former Chicago police officer. Pierce outspent O’Halleran by a wide margin, $226,145 compared to $68,240.Pierce said during the campaign he had no intention of writing any new laws.”I’m for less government,” Pierce said in an August interview.He said the Legislature writes too many bills and he would avoid introducing new legislation if possible.Pierce was not available for comment Tuesday night.

LD2-HouseDemocratic Primary

Deschene/10,443/51.4%

Chabin/6,835/33.7%

Haughwout/3,032/14.9%

LD1-SenateRepublican Primary

Pierce/12,280/52.9%

O’Halleran/10,918/47.1%