NABA-AZ Student Mixer

The second NABA-AZ/Student Mixer was a huge success! We had a great turnout and were able to award four book scholarships. A special thank you goes out to Vanessa Martinez, Board Member Sonia Nayeri’s sister, for making a generous donation of $1,000 to our organization. This donation was used in NABA-AZ’s first book scholarship program.

The following students were awarded $250 scholarships:

Jordan Hale, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, 3L
Michael Carter, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, 3L
Robin Commanda, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, 1L
Chris Monatukwa, Phoenix School of Law, 1L

Thanks to everyone for coming out to the mixer last night. We had an even bigger turnout than last year and we hope to have this event every year!
Kerry

Kerry Patterson, Esq.Fennemore Craig, P.C.3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 2600Phoenix, Arizona 85012Phone: 602-916-5491Facsimile: 602-916-5691Email: kpatters@fclaw.com

Chronicle of Higher Education article featuring ILP

American Indian Law: a Surge of Interest on Campuses

By KATHERINE MANGAN
Tempe, Az.

Growing up on a Navajo reservation near Gallup, N.M., Jordan Hale never dreamed he would one day be standing in front of a courtroom recommending whether a defendant should be released on bond, or working with a prosecutor to draft a criminal complaint.

Becoming a lawyer was the farthest thing from the mind of the high-school runner whose home, at the end of a dirt road, had no running water or telephone.

Now he is one of 37 students, representing 29 Indian tribes, who are specializing in Indian law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. All but one of the students are American Indian, and they bring with them diverse traditions of such tribes as the Chippewa, Choctaw, Crow, Jicarilla Apache, and Mohawk.

At law schools nationwide, interest in Indian law is growing as the economic clout and political influence of the nation’s 562 federally recognized tribes have expanded.

Arizona State’s Indian Legal Program allows students who are pursuing their J.D.’s to simultaneously earn certificates in Indian law. They study the differences between the legal systems of tribes and that of the U.S. government, and many go on to represent the interests of tribes, Indian clients, or the federal government.

Tribes have sovereignty rights that are spelled out in treaties with the United States, so their laws don’t always align with the government’s. That is why, for instance, Indian tribes can open casinos that would not be permitted on nontribal land.

“More and more law schools are recognizing the importance of including Indian law in the curriculum because their graduates are encountering questions that require some knowledge of Indian law and sovereignty,” says Wenona T. Singel, an assistant professor of law at Michigan State University. Like many Indian law professors, Ms. Singel brings practical experience to the classroom. In addition to helping lead her law school’s Indian-law program, she serves as chief justice of her tribe, the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.

She says about 20 law schools nationwide report having Indian-law programs, while other experts say the number of full-fledged programs is about 12. Among the other law schools active in Indian law are those at Harvard University, Lewis and Clark College, and the Universities of Colorado, New Mexico, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Learning the basics of tribal law is more than an academic exercise for many law students.
A few states, including New Mexico, South Dakota, and Washington, have Indian-law topics on their bar exam that students must pass to practice law. Others, including Arizona, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana, and Oklahoma, are considering adding such a requirement. Students get hands-on training in legal clinics and clerkships like the one Mr. Hale pursued over the summer at the Gila River Indian Community, 17 miles south of Phoenix.

Nationally, Indian tribes take in billions of dollars in casino revenues, which have allowed some to build state-of-the art courthouses like Gila River’s.

Mr. Hale, who is entering his third year of law school at Arizona State, worked in Gila River’s criminal-law division under the supervision of April E. Olson, a 2006 graduate of the university’s Indian legal program. Ms. Olson, who is of Mexican Yaqui ancestry, is a prosecutor at Gila River.
The tribe’s modern, high-tech courthouse stands out amid a flat landscape of desert scrub. A few blocks away, the prosecution office where Mr. Hale and Ms. Olson prepare their cases is a shotgun mobile unit located behind fences topped with coils of barbed wire.

The casinos that have helped pay for courthouse upgrades have also spurred economic development, with shopping malls, restaurants, and service industries springing up on or near many reservations. As a result, “More big law firms are looking for people who are knowledgeable about Indian law,” said Kathlene M. Rosier, director of Arizona State’s program.
Such expertise is particularly valued in a state where more than a quarter of the land is owned by one of 22 Indian tribes.

Many of the legal questions that arise involve jurisdictional disputes between the tribal and federal or state governments. For instance, what happens when an outsider commits a crime on tribal land, or a company tries to repossess a car parked on a reservation? Legal standards may also differ: Environmental regulations may be stricter on tribal lands, and child-welfare laws more relaxed to accommodate traditions of caring for children in extended families. Indian reservations, many of which are located on arid lands, have battled with the federal government over water access, with dueling parties claiming the rights to the same water sources.

Such issues are tackled in classes at the University of New Mexico’s Indian Law Program, one of the oldest and largest in the country. The program includes required courses, like those in Indian law and federal jurisdiction, and electives like Indian gaming, Indian water law, and state-tribal relations.

Because of the shortage of American Indian lawyers, graduates specializing in the field often land high-level positions. Shortly after completing Arizona State’s program, Claudette C. White became, at age 35, the youngest chief judge ever on the Fort Yuma-Quechan Reservation, where she grew up, near the intersection of Arizona, California, and Mexico.

Even after she graduated and became the tribe’s top legal authority, in 2006, she found herself turning to her professors for advice. One of them, Kevin Gover, is a former assistant secretary for Indian affairs at the U.S. Department of the Interior. (He has since become director of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of the American Indian).

“Sometimes I had to adjourn court to affirm that I was heading in the right direction,” Ms. White said. Mr. Gover wouldn’t just tell her the answers. Instead he would remind her about class discussions and readings and help her work through the solution.

Although she was fresh out of law school, Ms. White was no stranger to tribal governance.
She majored in criminal justice at Northern Arizona University before returning to the reservation. She plunged into tribal politics, becoming a court advocate and working as acting general manager of the tribe’s casino.

When she was named chief judge, shortly after graduating from law school, “Some people had doubts about whether I was ready because I was so young,” she said. “But I had had a lot of personal experiences directly relevant to the cases I’m working on.” A single mother who was raising her own child in addition to the two foster children she had taken on when her own mother died, Ms. White was sensitive to child-welfare issues that came before her in court. Her struggles with her own parents’ divorce and her father’s alcohol and drug addictions gave her insight into other cases that were all too common in her courtroom.

Despite aggressive recruiting by law schools, the number of American Indian lawyers remains tiny. Nationally, the number of American Indian and Alaskan Natives enrolled in J.D. programs has grown 19 percent over the last five years, to 1,216, according to the American Bar Association. Still, that is less than 1 percent of the 141,719 students who were enrolled in J.D. programs in the 2007-8 academic year.

The 1,216 enrollment estimate may be too high, according to Heather Dawn Thompson, president of the National Native American Bar Association and a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux. Most law schools report enrollments based on the number of students who simply checked a “Native American” box. “A lot of students figure, ‘I was born in America – I’m a native’ and they figure that checking it will improve their chances of getting in, she says.
Because of the dearth of American Indian lawyers, cases involving Indians are usually handled by lawyers who are unfamiliar with tribal laws.

Nathan St. Goddard, a student at the University of Montana School of Law who worked with Mr. Hale over the summer at the Gila River reservation, believes it is important to have Indian lawyers representing the needs of Indian people. While other lawyers may come with the best intentions, they won’t have the same cultural sensitivity, he says.

“People come with some idealized notion of wanting to help the Indians and save the buffalos, but they don’t know what they’re doing,” says Mr. St. Goddard, a member of the Blackfeet tribe.
“What I see happening all the time is a non-Indian who has this romantic view of the ‘noble savage’ who thinks that we sit in our teepees and bang on our drums and pray to Mother Earth and cry every time we see a piece of trash on the ground.” What he sees when he returns home is a poor, dirty reservation of 1.5 million acres patrolled by a little more than a dozen tribal police officers. The tribal court, as well as the jail, is swamped. With his legal training and understanding of tribal life, he hopes to help change that, and would like to see other Indian students follow in his footsteps.

“Indians,” he says, “need to start saving themselves.”

ASU NALSA Golf Tournament

Saturday, November 1, 2008
The Foothills Golf Course
Awahtukee, Phoenix, AZ
7:30 A.M. Shotgun Start

ENTRY FEE: $100 per player
Includes: Green Fees, Cart Fees, Range Balls, 1 Raffle Ticket and Lunch

PRIZES
Longest Drive

Closest to the Pin
Putting Contests
Raffle
Team Placing: Men, Women, And Co-ed

“You’re not really competing with each other; you’re competing against the golf course. . . Golf is a game that is played on a five-inch course – the distance between your ears.” ~Bobby Jones

The Native American Law Student Association (NALSA) at the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law cordially invites you to participate in its 3rd Annual Golf Tournament to be held on Saturday, November 1st, 2008. The scramble format tourney will take place at The Foothills Golf Course in Awahtukee (Phx.), AZ.

For further information or to request an entry form, please contact:

Brian @ bllewis2@asu.edu

Deadline for entry is Saturday, October 18th, 2008. Players may also enter late up to the day of the event for $120 per player (subject to space availability).

Tournament Sponsorships Available

Student Mixer with NABA-AZ

Dear NABA-AZ Members:

Please join us on Thursday September 25th at 5:30 p.m. at Macayo’s in Tempe for our second NABA-AZ Student Mixer! The details are on the attached flyer. At the mixer, we will be announcing the three NABA-AZ Book Scholarship winners. Please RSVP to Jenny Braybrooke at jbraybro@fclaw.com or 602-916-5247 by September 18th

Hope to see you there!

Thanks!

Kerry Patterson
NABA-AZ President

Breann Swann presents at Tokyo conference

Breann Yoshiko Swann, an LL.M. student in the Indian Legal Program, will give a presentation on Aug. 28 in Tokyo as part of the United Nations University/UNESCO 2008 Conference on Globalization and Languages, which will explore the contribution of linguistic diversity and multilingualism to development and their value for dialogue, social cohesion and peace. Swann will speak on “Changing the Language of Industry: Setting Standards for the Protection of Indigenous Languages in the Workplace.” Swann’s presentation explores the role that language use in the workplace plays in preserving indigenous languages.

“Research suggests that, absent revitalization efforts, 155 of the approximately 175 extant Native American languages in the United States will die by the year 2060,” according to Swann’s presentation abstract. “The prognosis for the remaining indigenous languages in other parts of the world is, for the most part, equally grim.”

While there are some efforts to preserve indigenous language, those efforts are focused on education and domestic and social use, Swann writes. Meanwhile, industry and employers are moving to a largely monolingual global workplace. Swann argues that the presence of indigenous language in the workplace may be crucial to its survival and analyzes different instruments that could be used to protect language in the employment sphere. The conference is organized by the United Nations University, established by the United Nations, and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Swann is a licensed attorney practicing in the areas of federal Indian law and labor and employment law. She currently works for the Office of the General Counsel of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, where she provides strategic advice and counsel regarding various aspects of tribal governance. Her work with the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community focuses primarily on tribal labor and employment matters and the development of tribal ordinances and policies. Building upon her practical legal experience, she has concentrated her recent scholarship on the social and political ramifications of language policies and practices in the workplace. She received her J.D. from the University of Southern California and her B.A. from Yale University. She will receive her LL.M. in Tribal Policy, Law and Government from the College of Law in May 2009. Prior to entering the field of Indian law, she was a practitioner of labor and employment law in the Los Angeles office of Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP.

Class of 2008

Congrats to The ILP’s Graduating Class of 2008!
Alejandro Acosta
Deborah Ann Begay
Matt Campbell
Jerome Clarke
Tana Fitzpatrick
Chia Halpern
Bartley Harris (JD/MBA)
Lena Jackson (MLS)
Samuel Lofland
Steve Maynard
Mary Modrich -Alverado
Autumn Monteau
Suzanne Nunn
Ryan Sheehan
Sabastian Zavala

Congratulations to Dan Lewis (1L)!

Congratulations to Dan Lewis (1L) for receiving two honors this month!

Dan was selected as one of the four 2008 AAABA Thomas Tang Scholarship Award recipients and will receive a $2,000 scholarship.

Dan was also named a 2008 Cohen Professionalism Scholar. See article below about the Cohen Scholars.

Congratulations Dan!

Cohen Scholars named at Law School
Posing with (far left) Dean Patricia White and (far right) Maricopa CountySuperior Court Bruce R. Cohen and Loren Cohen are the 2008 CohenProfessionalism Scholars at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law,(left to right) Amy M. Coughenour, Daniel A. Lewis, Meghan McCauley,Natalie Greaves and Alison Atwater. For their prize-winning essays abou tintegrity, the students received scholarship money from the Cohens andwill visit the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles this summer.

Meghan McCauley, a first-year law student at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, recently was chosen as the winner of the 2008 Cohen Professionalism Scholars competition, based on an essay she wrote about integrity. McCauley, whose essay was entitled, “Commandment 10: Honor who you are and you will bring honor to what you do,” received a $1,000 scholarship from the sponsors of the contest, Loren Cohen and Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Bruce R. Cohen, an alumnus of the College of Law. The Cohens awarded second place and a $500 scholarship to Alison Atwater, and honorable mentions, along with $250 scholarships, to Amy M. Coughenour, Natalie Greaves and Daniel A. Lewis. The Cohens will be taking the students to the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles in June. This is the third annual presentation of the awards. The Cohens visited the law school on Tuesday, April 8, to give the awards and to talk about the topic of the essay competition, integrity. “Integrity is not a black and white issue,” Judge Cohen said. “Integrity is the result of the struggle that goes on in your own mind and how you act upon those thoughts.” He showed a clip from the movie, The Rainmaker, in which actor Matt Damon portrays a young lawyer who is faced with right and wrong. Paraphrasing from the film, Judge Cohen noted that “every lawyer in every case has the opportunity to cross the line, and if you cross the line one too many times, it frequently disappears, and then you become a lawyer joke.” He encouraged the students to let their own standards be the highest against which they will be judged. “Every single day you have the opportunity to start with a clean slate – no matter what you did in the past, you choose what gets written on that slate,” Judge Cohen said. “No one can compromise your integrity, no one can tell you what to do.” The entire Class of 2010 submitted essays to the Cohens, writing about the greatest moral dilemmas they’d ever faced and how they were resolved. The Cohens said the submissions were entertaining and inspiring, making the judging very difficult. “If you’re not called up here, you nonetheless have inspired us and raised our optimism for the legal profession for the future,” Judge Cohen said. McCauley’s essay recounted her internal struggle with telling the truth about her past indiscretions when applying to get in to the Air Force, and risk not only being rejected, but bringing dishonor to three prior military generations of her family, or lying about her past and being admitted. “We never realize the dark skeletons we have in our closets until we are asked to fill out a character and fitness report, asking everything from, did we ever pull someone’s hair in the first grade to whether or not we took a sip of alcohol prior to the day we turned twenty one to whether or not we had committed misdemeanors or worse felonies,” McCauley wrote. To find out her decision, read her essay here. Atwater wrote a poem, “How Inmate Forty-Five Earned His Stripes,” a Dr. Seuss-metered, first-person view of a lawyer who was caught fudging a deal. The attorney’s conscience and guilt battle back and forth in the prose:
“I started with values, But where did they go? How the error escaped me I never will know.
I thought it was worth it To get where I was, But right has one reason, And that’s “Just because.” “So hand me that bucket, That mop and that pail. I must finish cleaning The floor of this jail.
To read Atwater’s poem, click here. Coughenour had no problem coming up with a topic for her essay. “Frankly, I’m jealous of whatever percentage of the class has to manufacture a problem to have something to write about,” she wrote. “In my 31 years, I’ve made so many moral and ethical decisions that I can hardly keep track, any one of which would be fertile ground for discussion here. The one she chose relates to the difficulty of being a law student and a single mother of three young girls and a proposal from her parents to allow the children to live with them during the week. She weighed the pros and cons, a moral battle that continues to rage in her head, and made her decision. In Greaves’ essay “The Kool-Aid Principle,” she spoke with her two children, Caleb and Aspen. The story focused on where she drew her line on ethics during a tiring visit to Wal-Mart. “We had finished a very long day of shopping for groceries,” she wrote. “I finally got you all out to the car, which is pretty much just like herding cats. I loaded you all into your car seats and put the groceries in the trunk. There, at the bottom of the otherwise empty shopping cart was the biggest, nastiest, test of integrity that any tired mom could ever have. It was a tiny little KOOL-AID packet. A ten cent, ruby red, bomb of temptation, aimed right at my strength and fortitude.” Read what Greaves did about it here. “My Ethical Dilemma” was the title of Lewis’ essay, which recounted his thought processes after finding a pair of sunglasses. The glasses were somewhat beat up, and not an expensive brand, and Lewis found himself thinking about keeping them. “Almost instinctively, humans know that it is immoral to take other people’s stuff,” he wrote. “Why had I even considered keeping them, even for a moment? I think that our human nature pushes us constantly and selfishly to seek gain. However we have to temper that nature with our morality.” To find out what Lewis decided, read his essay. Judge Cohen told the essay winners that he and Loren had no doubt that they will be exceptional representatives of the law school whose integrity will go a long way toward reducing, if not eliminating, lawyer jokes. “You moved us tremendously,” he said. “We have no idea where you stand in your class or where you are academically, but we know you will be successful professionals and bring honor to your work if you maintain what you evidenced in your writing.”

Meghan McCauley’s essayAlison Atwater’s essayAmy M. Coughenour’s essayNatalie Greaves’ essayDaniel A. Lewis’ essay