{"id":1602,"date":"2011-05-04T16:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-04T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/"},"modified":"2014-10-08T18:21:26","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T18:21:26","slug":"tohono-oodham-v-glendale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/","title":{"rendered":"Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale, 1 CA-CV 10-0341 (Ariz. App. May 3, 2011)<\/p>\n<p>The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday reversing summary judgment on the annexation issue:<\/p>\n<p>Excerpt:<\/p>\n<p>The Tohono O\u2019odham Nation (\u201cNation\u201d) appeals the grant of summary judgment to the City of Glendale (\u201cGlendale\u201d) on Nation\u2019s challenge to Glendale\u2019s purported annexation of real property owned by Nation. For the reasons that follow, we hold that when the validity of a municipality\u2019s annexation ordinance is timely challenged in court, the annexation does not automatically become final thirty days after the ordinance was adopted. Accordingly, we reverse the grant of summary judgment in favor of Glendale and remand for entry of judgment in favor of Nation.<\/p>\n<p>Get the decision: <a href=\"http:\/\/azcourts.gov\/Portals\/89\/opinionfiles\/CV\/CV100341.pdf\">http:\/\/azcourts.gov\/Portals\/89\/opinionfiles\/CV\/CV100341.pdf<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale, 1 CA-CV 10-0341 (Ariz. App. May 3, 2011) The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday reversing summary judgment on the annexation issue: Excerpt: The Tohono O\u2019odham Nation (\u201cNation\u201d) appeals the grant of summary judgment &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tohono O&#039;odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tohono O&#039;odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale, 1 CA-CV 10-0341 (Ariz. App. May 3, 2011) The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday reversing summary judgment on the annexation issue: Excerpt: The Tohono O\u2019odham Nation (\u201cNation\u201d) appeals the grant of summary judgment &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Indian Legal Program\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-04T16:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-08T18:21:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/9\/files\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/ILP-social-share_blog2022-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Indian Legal Program\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Indian Legal Program\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\",\"name\":\"Tohono O'odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-04T16:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-08T18:21:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/e936df29158d1ed561630688e0c413ef\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/\",\"name\":\"Indian Legal Program\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/e936df29158d1ed561630688e0c413ef\",\"name\":\"Indian Legal Program\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62bd2f49621cd65d5dfdee9157966074?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62bd2f49621cd65d5dfdee9157966074?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Indian Legal Program\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/author\/kitevis\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tohono O'odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tohono O'odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program","og_description":"Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale, 1 CA-CV 10-0341 (Ariz. App. May 3, 2011) The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday reversing summary judgment on the annexation issue: Excerpt: The Tohono O\u2019odham Nation (\u201cNation\u201d) appeals the grant of summary judgment &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/","og_site_name":"Indian Legal Program","article_published_time":"2011-05-04T16:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-08T18:21:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/9\/files\/sites\/2\/2022\/09\/ILP-social-share_blog2022-2.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Indian Legal Program","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Indian Legal Program","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/","url":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/","name":"Tohono O'odham v. Glendale - Indian Legal Program","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-04T16:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-08T18:21:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/e936df29158d1ed561630688e0c413ef"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/2011\/05\/04\/tohono-oodham-v-glendale\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tohono O&#8217;odham v. Glendale"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#website","url":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/","name":"Indian Legal Program","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/e936df29158d1ed561630688e0c413ef","name":"Indian Legal Program","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62bd2f49621cd65d5dfdee9157966074?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62bd2f49621cd65d5dfdee9157966074?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Indian Legal Program"},"url":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/author\/kitevis\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1602"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3864,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602\/revisions\/3864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsletters.asucollegeoflaw.com\/ilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}